Date: 7/21/95
To: SAC, LOS ANGELES (28A-LA-NEW)
From: [Redacted]
Subject: UNSUB(S)
MASTER RECORDINGS OF ERIC WRIGHT
COPYRIGHT MATTER
OO: LOS ANGELES
RE memo to SAC dated 07/05/95
The writer was advised by [redacted] who advised that during his investigation into estate claims, former RUTHLESS RECORDS (RR) [redacted] advised that rapper EAZY-E had several master recordings in two suitcases in the trunk of his car prior to his death. These belong to the estate of EAZY-E. [Redacted] believes that [redacted] set up a deal with a man in Canada named [redacted] who had these masters in his possession.
[Redacted] was advised by [redacted] that [redacted] said [redacted] had put him up to it. An attorney from [redacted] firm telephonically contacted [redacted] and confirmed this. [Redacted] later changed his story and stated that [redacted] had told him to set up the company, not [redacted]. [Redacted] subsequently questioned both [redacted] and [redacted] and both denied knowing [redacted] or giving him any recordings.
The writer has interviewed [redacted] of RUTHLESS RECORDS who has stated that he has no knowledge of who [redacted] is or [redacted] or [redacted] involvement in the case. The writer has also interviewed [redacted] who has advised that her client has no knowledge of who [redacted] is. Additionally, she denies sending suitcases of master recordings to [redacted]. [Redacted] has given a deposition in the estate case stating that "I have never met [redacted]. [Redacted] have never hired him for any purpose, and I have never paid him any money for any purpose;".
The writer has also interviewed [redacted] who denies having anything to do with providing the master recordings to [redacted]. [Redacted] has provided the writer with four original tapes of telephone conversations he had with [redacted] in an attempt to determine who set this up. The writer has reviewed the tapes where [redacted] states that [redacted] each to set up an office for RR in Ontario. He states that she [redacted] claims to have taped conversations with [redacted] regarding setting up the deal.
The original telephone number for [redacted] was [redacted] with a business address of [redacted] this number is no longer in service. During one of the taped conversations between [redacted] he gives a pager number of [redacted]. [Redacted] claims that he has put all evidence in this matter in storage in Canada and during conversation with [redacted]. In addition, [redacted] states that he can't come back to Los Angeles because he [redacted]. He also claims that [redacted].
The following investigation needs to be conducted:
1. Have the four tapes provided by [redacted] transcribed.
To: SAC, LOS ANGELES (28A-LA-NEW)
From: [Redacted]
Subject: UNSUB(S)
MASTER RECORDINGS OF ERIC WRIGHT
COPYRIGHT MATTER
OO: LOS ANGELES
RE memo to SAC dated 07/05/95
The writer was advised by [redacted] who advised that during his investigation into estate claims, former RUTHLESS RECORDS (RR) [redacted] advised that rapper EAZY-E had several master recordings in two suitcases in the trunk of his car prior to his death. These belong to the estate of EAZY-E. [Redacted] believes that [redacted] set up a deal with a man in Canada named [redacted] who had these masters in his possession.
[Redacted] was advised by [redacted] that [redacted] said [redacted] had put him up to it. An attorney from [redacted] firm telephonically contacted [redacted] and confirmed this. [Redacted] later changed his story and stated that [redacted] had told him to set up the company, not [redacted]. [Redacted] subsequently questioned both [redacted] and [redacted] and both denied knowing [redacted] or giving him any recordings.
The writer has interviewed [redacted] of RUTHLESS RECORDS who has stated that he has no knowledge of who [redacted] is or [redacted] or [redacted] involvement in the case. The writer has also interviewed [redacted] who has advised that her client has no knowledge of who [redacted] is. Additionally, she denies sending suitcases of master recordings to [redacted]. [Redacted] has given a deposition in the estate case stating that "I have never met [redacted]. [Redacted] have never hired him for any purpose, and I have never paid him any money for any purpose;".
The writer has also interviewed [redacted] who denies having anything to do with providing the master recordings to [redacted]. [Redacted] has provided the writer with four original tapes of telephone conversations he had with [redacted] in an attempt to determine who set this up. The writer has reviewed the tapes where [redacted] states that [redacted] each to set up an office for RR in Ontario. He states that she [redacted] claims to have taped conversations with [redacted] regarding setting up the deal.
The original telephone number for [redacted] was [redacted] with a business address of [redacted] this number is no longer in service. During one of the taped conversations between [redacted] he gives a pager number of [redacted]. [Redacted] claims that he has put all evidence in this matter in storage in Canada and during conversation with [redacted]. In addition, [redacted] states that he can't come back to Los Angeles because he [redacted]. He also claims that [redacted].
The following investigation needs to be conducted:
1. Have the four tapes provided by [redacted] transcribed.
Comments (0)
The minimum comment length is 50 characters.
Information
Users of Guests are not allowed to comment this publication.
There are no comments yet. You can be the first!